The recent ruling by a three-judge bench in the case of Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd. v. Delhi Airport Metro Express Pvt. Ltd. (“DMRC case”) has drawn significant criticism from legal scholars and practitioners. However, this criticism may be somewhat misplaced. The primary criticism appears to focus on the exercise of curative jurisdiction. However, just…
I hope you will join me today for a session on “Seat vs. Venue under Arbitration Law.” This interactive event is being hosted by Beyond Law CLC at 6:00 PM. I look forward to seeing you all there. Date: 19th May 2024 Time: 6:00 PM Zoom ID: 859 321 3687 Password: 8787
Part of a panel discussion hosted by BW Legal World for the Legal Summit, 2024 at the Imperial Hotel along with Samir Jain, Shashank Garg, Arush Khanna, Mehul Parti, Sonal Kumar Singh and Divyam Agarwal
What a fulfilling experience to speak to an exceptionally well-informed audience of industry peers and colleagues regarding the complexities inherent in multi-party and multi-contract construction arbitrations, both from a domestic and international perspective. #Constructionarbitration #Construction #Arbitration #internationalarbitration #domesticarbitration #multipartyarbitration #multicontractarbitration
Juscontractus is the proud Gold Sponsor of the 3rd Annual Construction Claim and Dispute Management Summit, 2024, being held on 27th & 28th March, 2024. Friends and colleagues in Mumbai, do join us. #arbitration#construction#constructionarbitration#disputes#constructiondisputes
Panel discussion with Mr Amarjit Singh Chandiok, Mr Nakul Dewan, Mr Satvik Verma, Mr Arush Khanna & Mr Shreyas Mehrotra
The Government of India has recently constituted an expert body to review the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and propose reforms. One important reform would be the statutory recognition of arbitrability of fraud and to put an end to the ambiguity surrounding the issue. In India, the arbitrability of fraud has been developed entirely by case law,…
The power of courts to modify arbitral awards has been a subject of contention. It is important to settle this matter by enacting legislation that codifies the power of modification of awards. We argue that courts must have some discretion, i.e., residual power, to modify awards. Legislative intervention is necessary to bring clarity and consistency…